Poster Presentation Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand and Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society Joint Scientific Meeting 2017

Interventions designed to reduce gestational weight gain can reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis (#106)

Christie J Bennett 1 , Ruth E Walker 1 , Michelle L Blumfield 1 , Stella M Gwini 2 , Jianhua Ma 3 , Fenglei Wang 4 , Yi Wan 4 , Hayley Dickinson 5 6 , Helen Truby 1
  1. Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia
  2. Bio-statistics Platform, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University , Clayton, VIC, Australia
  3. Institute of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou Shi, Gansu Sheng, China
  4. Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
  6. The Richie Centre, The Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia

Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) increases the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Many interventions have been designed to reduced GWG. However, the effect on GDM is still unknown. This systematic review (SLR) aimed to (i) evaluate the impact of interventions designed to prevent excessive GWG on the incidence of GDM, and (ii) examine if effects differ by geographical region and body mass index (BMI). A SLR of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted without date limits using seven international databases and three Chinese databases. RCTs that reported a primary/secondary aim to reduce excessive GWG and the incidence of GDM were considered. Two authors independently identified and assessed the included studies. Meta-analysis data are reported as risk ratio (RR) for GDM incidence with interventions covering diet, physical activity (PA) and lifestyle (diet plus PA).Of 20,517 manuscripts screened, 45 were included and 37 were included in the meta-analysis (n=12,942). Diet interventions reduced the risk of GDM by 44% (RR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36-0.87, p=0.009), while PA interventions reduced the risk by 38% (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50-0.78). Both lifestyle interventions and BMI did not significantly alter the risk. PA interventions from Southern Europe reduced GDM risk by 37% (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.80). Both diet and lifestyle interventions conducted in Asia resulted in a 62% (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.59) and 32% (RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.86) reduction in GDM, respectively. Interventions designed to prevent excessive GWG can reduce the risk of GDM. Regional differences indicate that other factors possibly physiological and/or behavioural responses to intervention type must be taken into consideration when planning GDM prevention strategies, certainly, the one size fits all approach is not supported.